‘The development of nationalistic policies was primarily due to the ruling elite in Germany from 1789-1918’ Discuss (24 marks)

This question is asking whether or not the rise of nationalism in the law in Germany within this period was primarily due to the decisions of the combined monarchy and government, or due to a widespread growth amongst the German population. A sample paragraph against this argument could be as follows:
Whilst it may be true that the birth of German nationalism was amongst the educated upper class, primarily lawyers, philosophers and students, it is an inaccurate statement that this rang true of the entire period. From the mid 30’s onwards, groups such as the Turnverein, a gymnastics society that prided itself in national health and strength, grew in numbers. By the 1890’s, literature such as ‘Germany at war”, which suggested that the country should prepare itself from imminent invasion from ‘foreigners’, had become a household pamphlet and remained in mass circulation until the end of the 20th century. Furthermore, by the beginning of the 20th century, the German volunteer army had amassed over 500,000. Therefore, it is impossible to ignore the involvement of the German people in the creation of German nationalistic policy. As nationalist sentiment arose amongst the masses, Wilhelm and his government learned to not only accommodate but cater for and encourage it.

NT

Related History A Level answers

All answers ▸

'A sterile interlude'. How valid is this judgement on the reign on Mary I?


How did the perspectives on the problems of urban life in Britain change from 1870 to 1914?


How do you make it clear what your argument is when you have to use scholars and sources too?


To what extent should the period of Conservative dominance between 1951 and 1964 be viewed as "Thirteen Wasted Years"?