MYTUTOR SUBJECT ANSWERS

772 views

Why was it Stalin, and not Trotsky, who succeeded Lenin?

When you approach any kind of essay question in History IB, you should firstly consider what exactly an examiner wants you to do, what type of question it is and, therefore, how your essay should be structured. In this case, the question clearly asks you to make a comparison from which you should draw a conclusion. You should balance Stalin's and Trotsky's advantages and disadvantages. Having done it, you should point out what exactly, in your opinion, was the reason for Stalin's success and Trotsky's failure. This quick and easy analysis provides you with the body of your essay.

Because it is a comparison, the best way to do it is to prepare three body paragraphs. First one will be devoted to Stalin, second one - to Trotsky, the last one will be a direct comparison of advantages and disadvantages introduced in previous paragraphs. So, in the first paragrpah Stalin's background should be metioned (he was a bolshevik, so he was considered to be more trustworthy than Trotsky). Then, it should be mentioned that he had much control over the Party's structure (he had been General Secretary from 1922), which basically meant many people owed him their positions. His pragmatic political beliefs were more popular amongst Party memebrs. He supported "socialism in one country", which was applauded by the Party exhausted with the civil war.

In case of Trotsky, is should be mentioned that he was a menshevik, so he was not really trusted. Also, he did not hold any important office in the party (it weakened his position). He was the leader of the Red Army, but it evoked fear rather than support. Party members were afraid of bonapartism and Trotsky's possible military dictatorship. His foreign policy was not favoured. He supported international revolution, which basically meant the war with capitalist countries (much more powerful than the USSR). Last but not least, his character was a problem. He was arrogant and was considered to be "an intelectualist". Party members did not understand him and disliked him.

In the last paragraph you should balance Stalin's advantages and Trotsky's disadvantages. Then, in the conclusion, you should sum up everything once again and outline why exactly, according to your argument, Stalin succeeded and Trotsky did not. What was the key reason (or reasons) for it? It is a good place to quote other historians (if you know their opinions) and assess them.

It is also a good idea to write your introduction in the end. It may sound a bit strange, but you must provide your reader with a clear thesis statement in the introduction. Considering you have a really modest amount of time available in your exam, it is possible that you will not stick to your thesis if you have it written in advance. As a result, essay might be incoherent and that is the worst thing that can happen. It is a better idea to write the whole essay, go back to the beginning and write your introduction then.

Jakub B. IB History tutor, IB English tutor, GCSE Law tutor, A Level ...

1 year ago

Answered by Jakub, an IB History tutor with MyTutor


Still stuck? Get one-to-one help from a personally interviewed subject specialist

12 SUBJECT SPECIALISTS

£36 /hr

Tsiona L.

Degree: History (Masters) - Edinburgh University

Subjects offered:History, History of Art+ 6 more

History
History of Art
English and World Literature
English Literature
English Language
-Personal Statements-

“Hello! My name is Tsiona, I'm studying my Master's in History at the University of Edinburgh. I have always loved history, talking through ideas and getting a clear understanding of the past. I am very friendly and patient, I love meet...”

£26 /hr

Jenevieve T.

Degree: BSc International Relations (Bachelors) - LSE University

Subjects offered:History, Maths+ 3 more

History
Maths
English Literature
English Language

“I am a second year student studying International Relations at the London School of Economics. My degree has allowed me to get into a subject that I love, there is no easy answer and there is always room for another opinion, fo rme th...”

£36 /hr

Jack Robert C.

Degree: PhD French Philosophy and German Literature (Doctorate) - Durham University

Subjects offered:History, Politics+ 2 more

History
Politics
Philosophy
English

“The beckoning of an authentic life shattered my soul around the age of twelve, falling into anabyss where the light of Philosophy and study of the academic disciplines redeemed my existence and became my redemption. I am now happy in ...”

About the author

Jakub B.

Currently unavailable: for regular students

Degree: Law (Bachelors) - Oxford, Wadham College University

Subjects offered:History, Law+ 2 more

History
Law
English
.LNAT.

“About Me: I'm a law student at the University of Oxford. I've been passionate about law since I started my high school. It's an amazingly logical subject that requires much analytical skills. What's the most interesting about it is th...”

MyTutor guarantee

You may also like...

Posts by Jakub

In what circumstances should abortion be permitted and why?

Why was it Stalin, and not Trotsky, who succeeded Lenin?

Other IB History questions

Evaluate the reasons for the collapse of the Provisional Government in November 1917.

How important is Historiography in IB History?

What do I know about getting good marks in IB History?

The Cold War: To what extent was Germany the cause of East-West disagreements between 1945 and 1961?

View IB History tutors

We use cookies to improve your site experience. By continuing to use this website, we'll assume that you're OK with this. Dismiss

mtw:mercury1:status:ok