MYTUTOR SUBJECT ANSWERS

657 views

What are the elements of common assault in Criminal Law?

Assault is conduct on behalf of the defendant that intentionally or recklessly causes the victim to apprehend immidiate and unlawful personal violenceR v Venna [1975] 3 All ER 788

You must have all the elements of assault ( in bold above). If any of them fail, assault is not made out.

1. "Conduct":  No actual violence is required. Conduct that simply causes apprehension personal violence is enough.  e.g. repeated silent telephone calls have been ruled to be sufficient. (R v Ireland; R v Burstow [1997] 4 All ER 225 ) The conduct element does not require physical action and words or, as in R v Ireland, silence alone are sufficient. What particulair form the words take (whether they are spoken to the victim or written)  is of no relevance as long as they cause the apprehension of unlawful violence. (Schiemann LJ in R v Constanza [1997] 2 Cr App Rep 492

2. "Intentionally or recklessly"

"Intentionally"  in the context of assault means deliberately. "Recklessly" can be distilled down to the defendant seeing the possibility of the risk and taking that risk anyway.   In the context of assault, the defendant  must foresse the possibility (even if very slight) that the victim may apprehend unlawful personal violence and take that risk.  

Remember, that the prosecution must prove that the defendant  saw the risk and took it anyway because recklessness is subjective (i.e. it is not enough  to prove  that the jury foresaw the risk). R v Cunningham [1957] 2 All ER 412 and R v G and another [2003] UKHL 50, 

3. “Apprehend” is expect but not necessarily fear

"Apprehension" is not synonymous with “fear” as it is possible to apprehend personal violence without fearing it and vice versa. Though they seem very close, R v Venna focuses on “apprehension” and not “fear”.

4."Immidiate" personal violence 

This has been interpreted broadly. The immediacy requirement was satisfied in R v Ireland (above)  by conduct that caused the victim to apprehend violence "within a minute or two"  (see R v Ireland above).

5. Threat must be unlawful

The threat will not be unlawful if made in self-defence or with consent of the victim.

Alexander K. GCSE Law tutor, A Level Law tutor, IB Russian tutor, GCS...

9 months ago

Answered by Alexander, an A Level Law tutor with MyTutor


Still stuck? Get one-to-one help from a personally interviewed subject specialist

19 SUBJECT SPECIALISTS

£22 /hr

Jessica D.

Degree: LAW (Bachelors) - Liverpool University

Subjects offered:Law

Law

“NEED HELP PASSING YOUR EXAMS? I am a Law Student who can help with those exam shortcuts that will help you learn fast and still achieve an A. ”

MyTutor guarantee

£26 /hr

Sanchia P.

Degree: LLM (Masters) - Exeter University

Subjects offered:Law, -Personal Statements-

Law
-Personal Statements-

“Hi, I am a Masters Law Student at the University of Exeter studying International Human Rights law. I am also a qualified teacher holding a PGCE in post-16 Education. I have been teaching A level law, BTEC and Foundation Law recently ...”

£20 /hr

David A.

Degree: Law with French Law (Bachelors) - Leeds University

Subjects offered:Law, French

Law
French

“I am a second year Law & French Law student who is an enthusiastic, committed and approachable individual with years of experience of learning French.”

MyTutor guarantee

About the author

Alexander K.

Currently unavailable: for new students

Degree: MSc in Taxation (Masters) - Oxford, Kellogg College University

Subjects offered:Law, Russian+ 1 more

Law
Russian
-Personal Statements-

“About me I am currently studying a postgraduate degree in Tax Law at the University of Oxford. I am looking forward to teaching you Law!  Law is full of hidden depths and is probably one of the most fascinating subjects out there (tho...”

You may also like...

Other A Level Law questions

What are the defences to murder?

Is the Human Rights Act destructive of Parliamentary Sovereignty?

What do you need to prove for Unlwaful Act Manslaughter (Constructive Manslaughter)?

To what extent can judicial subservience be held to represent a 'new settlement' with regard to constitutional authority in England and Wales?

View A Level Law tutors

We use cookies to improve your site experience. By continuing to use this website, we'll assume that you're OK with this. Dismiss

mtw:mercury1:status:ok