How does Mill's rule utilitarianism differ from Bentham's act utilitarianism?

Assuming a general understanding of Bentham's act utilitarianism, the difference lies in that Mill takes a more qualitative (concerning quality and non quantifiable understanding) approach to pleasure rather than Bentham's method of measuring pleasure which is quantitative, and derived by using the hedonic calculus.

Mill thought that pleasures have different values and distingushed between higher and lower pleasures. Higher pleasures being those associated with the mind and intellectual pursuits. And Lower pleasures being those associated with the body such as satisfying the bodily need for food.

He felt that higher pleasures are more desireable than lower ones. He said, "It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied". REMEMBER: it is always good to use quotations to demonstrate your understanding.

In addition, he believed that rules whould be formulated first, based on the utilitarian princciples. The individual can then judge whether specific acts are acceptable.

In contrast, Bentham's act utilitarianism states that each action should be judged on it's ability to bring the greatest happiness for the greatest number.

Mill's development can be explaned as a system that includes the individuals conscience, instead of the harsh and mechanistic appraoch of Bentham's act utilitarianism.

Anna S. GCSE Economics tutor, GCSE Philosophy and Ethics tutor, A Lev...

10 months ago

Answered by Anna, an A Level Philosophy and Ethics tutor with MyTutor

Still stuck? Get one-to-one help from a personally interviewed subject specialist


£20 /hr

Henrik S.

Degree: Physics and Philosophy (Integrated Masters) - Kings, London University

Subjects offered:Philosophy and Ethics, Physics+ 3 more

Philosophy and Ethics
-Personal Statements-

“I will teach my tutees to become expert problem solvers so that they can adapt to the requirements of any future examination.”

MyTutor guarantee

|  1 completed tutorial

£20 /hr

Ruby S.

Degree: Philosophy and Theology (Bachelors) - Edinburgh University

Subjects offered:Philosophy and Ethics, Philosophy+ 1 more

Philosophy and Ethics
English Literature

“Enthusiastic, friendly and accommodating. Lover of philosophy, I sympathise with the problems and frustrations of the GCSE and A-Level systems! ”

MyTutor guarantee

£20 /hr

Angharad L.

Degree: BA Philosophy and Theology (Bachelors) - Exeter University

Subjects offered:Philosophy and Ethics, Religious Studies+ 2 more

Philosophy and Ethics
Religious Studies

“I have experienced and believe that small inputs to children such as tutoring can have such a positive and long lasting effect.”

MyTutor guarantee

About the author

Anna S.

Currently unavailable: for new students

Degree: Philosophy, Politics and Economics (Bachelors) - Warwick University

Subjects offered:Philosophy and Ethics, Religious Studies+ 4 more

Philosophy and Ethics
Religious Studies
-Personal Statements-

“Hi my name is Anna, I am an undergraduate at the Universtiy of Warwick studying Philosophy, Politics and Economics.  Having just done my A-Levels I am very familiar with the A-Level exam and exactly what it is you need to do to pass, ...”

You may also like...

Other A Level Philosophy and Ethics questions

How can I critically engage with an argument that I support/like?

Isn't Kant's philosophy of ethics really unrealistic?

What is the difference between Falsificationism and Verificationism? Give a religious example of where they would disagree about the meaningfulness of a statement.

Critically assess the Teleological argument as proof for the existence of God

View A Level Philosophy and Ethics tutors

We use cookies to improve your site experience. By continuing to use this website, we'll assume that you're OK with this. Dismiss