Currently unavailable: for regular students
Degree: Philosophy (Doctorate) - Cambridge University
Enthusiastic, prize-winning Oxford and Cambridge graduate, specialising in Philosophy.
"I'm extremely passionate about philosophy, and about teaching; I have a lot of experience teaching experience; and I'll bring expert-level knowledge to your tutorials. I pride myself on making things easy to understand, and showing you the joy of wrapping your head around difficult concepts and conundrums. Get in touch for a tailor-made course of tutorials. I look forward to finding out how I can help you!"
2015-2018 PhD in Philosophy, University of Cambridge
2014-2015 MPhil in Philosophy, Distinction, University of Cambridge
2013-2014 MA in Philosophy, Distinction, Central European University, Budapest
2009-2013 BA in German & Philosophy, First Class, University of Oxford
2011-2012 Year abroad, Humboldt Universität, Berlin
2009 A Levels: German A, Maths A, Physics A, Critical Thinking A.
Advanced Extension Award: German Merit, Physics Merit.
Prizes and Awards
2015-8 AHRC Doctoral Award, University of Cambridge
2014 Timothy Joyce Studentship, University of Cambridge
2013 Partial CEU Fellowship, Central European University
Gibbs Prize in Philosophy, (best result in year) University of Oxford
Henry Wilde Prize in Philosophy, nomination (“truly outstanding” Finals performance) University of Oxford
2016 Philosophy Supervisor (undergraduate), University of Cambridge
A Level Philosophy teacher, Hills Road Sixth Form College, Cambridge
2015-6 Philosophy tutor (A Level, undergraduate), MyTutorWeb
Mentor and tutor (primary school), Cambridge Student Community Action
2015 Teacher of Philosophy, English & Music, SUKRUPA (Secondary School), Bangalore
Facilitator in Modern Foreign Languages, Crossley Heath School & Morley Academy
|Philosophy||A Level||£30 /hr|
|Philosophy and Ethics||A Level||£30 /hr|
|Philosophy and Ethics||GCSE||£30 /hr|
|-Personal Statements-||Mentoring||£30 /hr|
|Philosophy & German||Bachelors Degree||1st|
Izzi (Student) January 3 2016
Izzi (Student) January 8 2016
Izzi (Student) January 17 2016
Devon (Student) November 3 2015
What is a tabula rasa?
The empiricists held that humans are born as blank slates. This means that there are no 'innate ideas' -- ideas possessed at birth, prior to any experience. Locke used the analogy that the mind is a blank piece of paper, and that experience is what writes symbols on it.
1. A blind man can never grasp the idea of the colour red. This shows that ideas are derived from experience. It follows that at birth, prior to experience, we would have no ideas -- we would be 'blank slates'.
This observation is plausible. It provides an example of the view that ideas have their "origins in the senses", and that without those senses we would not have any ideas.
However, Hume needs to establish that this holds for all of our ideas. Someone could consistently accept that the idea of red must be derived from sensation (and hence would not be present at birth), but deny that this held for all sensations. For example, it is not obvious that the ideas of God, the soul or power are derived from the senses, so generalising from one example is unconvincing.
2. Hume issues the challenge to produce an idea that is not derived from experience. He argues that no such examples are to be found, and hence there are no counter-examples to the claim that all ideas are derived from sensation. This would have the consequence that we possess no ideas at birth, prior to having experience, and would hence be blank slates.
If Hume is right to hold that there are no counter-examples to be found, then this would indeed vindicate the view that the mind is a 'tabula rasa' at birth. However, there are some weaknesses in the way he argues: he relies on empiricist accounts of e.g. the idea of God; he accepts the possibility of having an idea of a "missing shade of blue", which would be a counter-example; and he appeals to his doctrine that all ideas are derived from experience to deny that we have any idea of "occult qualities" -- this seems circular.see more
Here's the passage that goes with the question:
"Öko-Mode und Luxus – eine Verbindung, die man lange nicht für möglich hielt. Luxus war in den Augen von Öko-Freunden etwas Unnötiges. Wer in den achtziger Jahren mit grünen Ideen sympathisierte, war mit dem Einfachen zufrieden."
The first sentence of the text provides the answer to the 'what' question; the rest answers the 'why' question. Remember to answer in full German sentences when the question is in German. You could write:
"Man konnte sich die Verbinding von Öko-Mode und Luxus nicht vorstellen, weil man dachte, dass grüne Ideen nur mit einfachem Stil zusammenpasste."
You need to find a way to repeat the information in your own words. The marks are for comprehension and accuracy, so there's no need to try to use complicated constructions. Just make sure you include the relevant information, and write in intelligible German.
Remember as a rule of thumb: 2 marks = 2 points to make.see more