Hello! I’m **George**. I'm a **University of Warwick graduate** with a **first-class Master of Mathematics degree**.

**> Why did you study Maths?**

Personally, I'm a problem solver. When I approach a puzzle I strive to master it. If things get tough I don't just throw in the towel. Instead, I try approaching the problem from different perspectives, applying different methods, or maybe even tackling special cases, just to gain that little bit of insight. And at the end of this slow and sometimes painful process comes immense satisfaction knowing that you've unequivocally conquered the problem. This is why I love Maths.

**> What differentiates you from other tutors?**

I've been successfully tutoring on MyTutor for **over two years** now with fantastic results and feedback from both students and parents (you can read them if you scroll down!).

Whilst at Warwick I was given the opportunity to be a **supervisor** to two groups of undergraduate Maths students; I **mentored** them throughout their first year and had a blast doing so!

Hello! I’m **George**. I'm a **University of Warwick graduate** with a **first-class Master of Mathematics degree**.

**> Why did you study Maths?**

Personally, I'm a problem solver. When I approach a puzzle I strive to master it. If things get tough I don't just throw in the towel. Instead, I try approaching the problem from different perspectives, applying different methods, or maybe even tackling special cases, just to gain that little bit of insight. And at the end of this slow and sometimes painful process comes immense satisfaction knowing that you've unequivocally conquered the problem. This is why I love Maths.

**> What differentiates you from other tutors?**

I've been successfully tutoring on MyTutor for **over two years** now with fantastic results and feedback from both students and parents (you can read them if you scroll down!).

Whilst at Warwick I was given the opportunity to be a **supervisor** to two groups of undergraduate Maths students; I **mentored** them throughout their first year and had a blast doing so!

In my tutorials the **student is in charge**: you dictate what we cover and the depth you want to go into your topic. During our tutorials we can:

- Go through certain **sections of your course** that you're struggling with.

- Look at **particular questions** which you can’t get your head around.

- **Identify areas of difficulty** by going through past paper questions and build on them.

I'll also offer advice on **exam technique**: establishing what the question is actually asking, **common mistakes**, and identifying what is required to **achieve full marks**.

**> Structure of Tutorials**

From experience, I tend to find the best tutorial structure is as follows:

- I will **introduce** and **explain** new **definitions and concepts.**

- We will work through several examples **together** and I'll give you the opportunity to practice similar questions **by yourself** to help **build your confidence.**

- We will then **consolidate the principles** that we have learned by tackling **previous exam questions.**

**> What now?**

You can book a 15-minute** FREE meeting** to get to know me better! :)

In my tutorials the **student is in charge**: you dictate what we cover and the depth you want to go into your topic. During our tutorials we can:

- Go through certain **sections of your course** that you're struggling with.

- Look at **particular questions** which you can’t get your head around.

- **Identify areas of difficulty** by going through past paper questions and build on them.

I'll also offer advice on **exam technique**: establishing what the question is actually asking, **common mistakes**, and identifying what is required to **achieve full marks**.

**> Structure of Tutorials**

From experience, I tend to find the best tutorial structure is as follows:

- I will **introduce** and **explain** new **definitions and concepts.**

- We will work through several examples **together** and I'll give you the opportunity to practice similar questions **by yourself** to help **build your confidence.**

- We will then **consolidate the principles** that we have learned by tackling **previous exam questions.**

**> What now?**

You can book a 15-minute** FREE meeting** to get to know me better! :)

No DBS Check

5from 153 customer reviews

Zahid (Student)

November 23 2017

Great tutor! Explains everything really well.

Linda (Parent)

November 22 2017

Great

Rron (Student)

November 17 2017

very good

Zahid (Student)

November 9 2017

Great tutor, teaches topics really well and in depth. Always awesome!

This is a question from a STEP II paper.

STEP questions always give you just enough information to solve the problem; we’re looking to use everything that we’re given. The first thing we should do is differentiate f(x) by the product rule. This is a step up from A-level since we’re considering a general function P(x), but the product rule still works just as usual:

f’(x) = P’(x)e^(-x²) - 2xP(x)e^(−x²) = e^(−x²)[P’(x) – 2xP(x)]

Now we can set the derivative we’ve found equal to zero for x = 0, ±a and ±b.

• f’(0) = P’(0) = 0

• f’(a) = e^(-a²)[P’(a) – 2aP(a)] = 0 ⇒ P’(a) - 2aP(a) = 0

• f’(-a) = e^(-a²) [P’(-a) + 2aP(-a)] = 0 ⇒ P’(-a) + 2aP(-a) = 0

• f’(b) = e^(-b²)[P’(b)– 2bP(b)] = 0 ⇒ P’(b) - 2bP(b) = 0

• f’(-b) = e^(-b²)[P’(-b) + 2bP(-b)] = 0 ⇒ P’(-b) + 2bP(-b) = 0

The only information we’re given that’s left is that the derivative of f(x) isn’t zero for any other values of x. So e^(−x²)[P’(x) – 2xP(x)] ≠ 0 for any other values of x. Since e^(−x²) is always non-zero we can deduce that P’(x) – 2xP(x) ≠ 0 for any other values of x.

We can now combine everything we know together: P’(x) - 2xP(x) = 0 **ONLY** for x = 0, ±a, ±b.

How do we proceed now? We’ve used all the information given in the question. Let’s look back at what we’re asked to do: we’re asked to **find** a polynomial P(x) which satisfies the above conditions. The trick here is to equate the polynomial P’(x) – 2xP(x) to a polynomial that we already know equals zero **ONLY** for x = 0, ±a, ±b. Then by comparing coefficients we can find coefficients for P(x). Let’s use x(x - a)(x + a)(x - b)(x + b) = x(x² - a²)(x² - b²) = **x⁵ - (a² + b²)x³ + a²b²x**.

**What order does P(x) need to be?** The order of x⁵ - (a² + b²)x³ + a²b²x is 5, so in order for P’(x) – 2xP(x) to have order 5 as well P(x) needs to have order 4.

Note that x⁵ - (a² + b²)x³ + a²b²x has no x⁴ or x² terms so our P(x) should have no x³ or x terms to avoid x⁴ or x² terms cropping up in P’(x) – 2xP(x).

Thus P(x) = αx⁴ + βx² + γ for some α, β, γ to be determined.

P’(x) – 2xP(x) = (4αx³ + 2βx) – (2αx⁵ + 2βx³ + 2γx) = –2αx⁵ + (4α - 2β)x³ + (2β - 2γ)x

And now we equate coefficients:

–2αx⁵ + (4α - 2β)x³ + (2β - 2γ)x ≡ x⁵ - (a² + b²)x³ + a²b²x

• –2α = 1 ⇒ **α = -0.5**

• 4α - 2β = - a² - b² ⇒ -2 - 2β = - a² - b² ⇒ **β = (a² + b² - 2)/2**

• 2β - 2γ = a²b² ⇒ a² + b² - 2 - 2γ = a²b² ⇒ **γ = (a² + b²- a²b² - 2)/2**

Hence P(x) = -0.5x⁴ + (a² + b² - 2)x²/2 + (a² + b²- a²b² - 2)/2 is a solution.

This is a question from a STEP II paper.

STEP questions always give you just enough information to solve the problem; we’re looking to use everything that we’re given. The first thing we should do is differentiate f(x) by the product rule. This is a step up from A-level since we’re considering a general function P(x), but the product rule still works just as usual:

f’(x) = P’(x)e^(-x²) - 2xP(x)e^(−x²) = e^(−x²)[P’(x) – 2xP(x)]

Now we can set the derivative we’ve found equal to zero for x = 0, ±a and ±b.

• f’(0) = P’(0) = 0

• f’(a) = e^(-a²)[P’(a) – 2aP(a)] = 0 ⇒ P’(a) - 2aP(a) = 0

• f’(-a) = e^(-a²) [P’(-a) + 2aP(-a)] = 0 ⇒ P’(-a) + 2aP(-a) = 0

• f’(b) = e^(-b²)[P’(b)– 2bP(b)] = 0 ⇒ P’(b) - 2bP(b) = 0

• f’(-b) = e^(-b²)[P’(-b) + 2bP(-b)] = 0 ⇒ P’(-b) + 2bP(-b) = 0

The only information we’re given that’s left is that the derivative of f(x) isn’t zero for any other values of x. So e^(−x²)[P’(x) – 2xP(x)] ≠ 0 for any other values of x. Since e^(−x²) is always non-zero we can deduce that P’(x) – 2xP(x) ≠ 0 for any other values of x.

We can now combine everything we know together: P’(x) - 2xP(x) = 0 **ONLY** for x = 0, ±a, ±b.

How do we proceed now? We’ve used all the information given in the question. Let’s look back at what we’re asked to do: we’re asked to **find** a polynomial P(x) which satisfies the above conditions. The trick here is to equate the polynomial P’(x) – 2xP(x) to a polynomial that we already know equals zero **ONLY** for x = 0, ±a, ±b. Then by comparing coefficients we can find coefficients for P(x). Let’s use x(x - a)(x + a)(x - b)(x + b) = x(x² - a²)(x² - b²) = **x⁵ - (a² + b²)x³ + a²b²x**.

**What order does P(x) need to be?** The order of x⁵ - (a² + b²)x³ + a²b²x is 5, so in order for P’(x) – 2xP(x) to have order 5 as well P(x) needs to have order 4.

Note that x⁵ - (a² + b²)x³ + a²b²x has no x⁴ or x² terms so our P(x) should have no x³ or x terms to avoid x⁴ or x² terms cropping up in P’(x) – 2xP(x).

Thus P(x) = αx⁴ + βx² + γ for some α, β, γ to be determined.

P’(x) – 2xP(x) = (4αx³ + 2βx) – (2αx⁵ + 2βx³ + 2γx) = –2αx⁵ + (4α - 2β)x³ + (2β - 2γ)x

And now we equate coefficients:

–2αx⁵ + (4α - 2β)x³ + (2β - 2γ)x ≡ x⁵ - (a² + b²)x³ + a²b²x

• –2α = 1 ⇒ **α = -0.5**

• 4α - 2β = - a² - b² ⇒ -2 - 2β = - a² - b² ⇒ **β = (a² + b² - 2)/2**

• 2β - 2γ = a²b² ⇒ a² + b² - 2 - 2γ = a²b² ⇒ **γ = (a² + b²- a²b² - 2)/2**

Hence P(x) = -0.5x⁴ + (a² + b² - 2)x²/2 + (a² + b²- a²b² - 2)/2 is a solution.

This refers to a question in the Edexcel GCSE paper this year which took students to Twitter venting their frustration. The question is as follows:

**‘There are n sweets in a bag. 6 of the sweets are orange. The rest of the sweets are yellow.**

**Hannah takes a random sweet from the bag. She eats the sweet.**

**Hannah then takes at random another sweet from the bag. She eats the sweet.**

**The probability that Hannah eats two orange sweets is 1/3.**

**Show that n² – n – 90 = 0’**

Seemingly out of nowhere you’re asked to prove that a certain quadratic equation holds using the information provided. The first three lines set up the situation whilst the fourth line provides you with some extra information to use to obtain the answer. Intuition should tell you that you need to calculate the probability that Hannah eats two orange sweet using the first three lines and then apply what you’re given in the fourth line.

So let’s do that. What’s the probability that the first sweet she eats from the bag is orange? There are **n** sweets in the bag, **6** of which are orange. So the probability is 6/n.

What’s the probability that the second sweet she eats from the bag is orange? Now there are **n-1** sweets in the bag, **5** of which are orange (since she has eaten an orange sweet!). So the probability is 5/(n-1).

These two events are separate from one another, so the probability that both happen (i.e. both the sweets are orange) are the two probabilities multiplied together: 6/n × 5/(n-1) = 30/n(n-1)

But you’re told that this probability is 1/3! So all you need to do is set the expression equal to 1/3, rearrange and (hopefully!) obtain the required quadratic equation.

30/n(n-1) = 1/3

⇒ 90/n(n-1) = 1 *(multiplying both sides by 3)*

⇒ 90 = n(n-1) *(multiplying both sides by n(n-1))*

⇒ n(n-1) – 90 = 0 (*subtracting 90 from both sides*)

⇒ n² – n – 90 = 0 *(expanding the brackets)*

Tah-dah. We’ve found the required equation and we’re done. This question was only worth three marks; a bit stingy in my opinion!

This refers to a question in the Edexcel GCSE paper this year which took students to Twitter venting their frustration. The question is as follows:

**‘There are n sweets in a bag. 6 of the sweets are orange. The rest of the sweets are yellow.**

**Hannah takes a random sweet from the bag. She eats the sweet.**

**Hannah then takes at random another sweet from the bag. She eats the sweet.**

**The probability that Hannah eats two orange sweets is 1/3.**

**Show that n² – n – 90 = 0’**

Seemingly out of nowhere you’re asked to prove that a certain quadratic equation holds using the information provided. The first three lines set up the situation whilst the fourth line provides you with some extra information to use to obtain the answer. Intuition should tell you that you need to calculate the probability that Hannah eats two orange sweet using the first three lines and then apply what you’re given in the fourth line.

So let’s do that. What’s the probability that the first sweet she eats from the bag is orange? There are **n** sweets in the bag, **6** of which are orange. So the probability is 6/n.

What’s the probability that the second sweet she eats from the bag is orange? Now there are **n-1** sweets in the bag, **5** of which are orange (since she has eaten an orange sweet!). So the probability is 5/(n-1).

These two events are separate from one another, so the probability that both happen (i.e. both the sweets are orange) are the two probabilities multiplied together: 6/n × 5/(n-1) = 30/n(n-1)

But you’re told that this probability is 1/3! So all you need to do is set the expression equal to 1/3, rearrange and (hopefully!) obtain the required quadratic equation.

30/n(n-1) = 1/3

⇒ 90/n(n-1) = 1 *(multiplying both sides by 3)*

⇒ 90 = n(n-1) *(multiplying both sides by n(n-1))*

⇒ n(n-1) – 90 = 0 (*subtracting 90 from both sides*)

⇒ n² – n – 90 = 0 *(expanding the brackets)*

Tah-dah. We’ve found the required equation and we’re done. This question was only worth three marks; a bit stingy in my opinion!

This is a question from a FP1 paper. Here i denotes √-1.

Fact that should be burned into your soul: **‘Complex roots of a polynomial equation with real coefficients form conjugate pairs’**. This tells you if z = x + yi is a root then so is its conjugate z* = x – yi. Using this fact, we can deduce that 2 + i and -1 – 2i are also roots of P(z) = 0.

So we now have 4 roots of our **quartic **equation P(z) = 0, so that’s all of them! We can now employ the **factor theorem** that you (probably) met in C1. Remember, this states that if z = α is a root of a polynomial then (z – α) is a factor of that polynomial.

So, since we’re told the leading coefficient of P(z) is 1 we can apply the factor theorem to deduce that

P(z) = (z – (2 - i))(z – (2 + i))(z – (-1 + 2i))(z – (-1 - 2i))

So now all it comes down to is some tedious expansion of brackets and a bit of simplification. It’s a good exercise to build your confidence with complex numbers.

⇒ P(z) = (z – 2 + i)(z – 2 – i)(z + 1 – 2i)(z + 1 + 2i)

⇒ P(z) = (z² - 2z – zi – 2z + 4 + 2i + zi - 2i - i²)(z² + z + 2zi + z + 1 + 2i – 2zi – 2i - 4i²)

⇒ P(z) = (z² - 4z + 5)(z² + 2z + 5) [Remember: i² = - 1 by definition]

⇒ P(z) = z⁴ + 2z³ + 5z² - 4z³ - 8z² - 20z + 5z² + 10z + 25

⇒ P(z) = z⁴ - 2z³ + 2z² - 10z + 25

Thus a = -2, b = 2, c = -10, d = 25 and we’re done.

This is a question from a FP1 paper. Here i denotes √-1.

Fact that should be burned into your soul: **‘Complex roots of a polynomial equation with real coefficients form conjugate pairs’**. This tells you if z = x + yi is a root then so is its conjugate z* = x – yi. Using this fact, we can deduce that 2 + i and -1 – 2i are also roots of P(z) = 0.

So we now have 4 roots of our **quartic **equation P(z) = 0, so that’s all of them! We can now employ the **factor theorem** that you (probably) met in C1. Remember, this states that if z = α is a root of a polynomial then (z – α) is a factor of that polynomial.

So, since we’re told the leading coefficient of P(z) is 1 we can apply the factor theorem to deduce that

P(z) = (z – (2 - i))(z – (2 + i))(z – (-1 + 2i))(z – (-1 - 2i))

So now all it comes down to is some tedious expansion of brackets and a bit of simplification. It’s a good exercise to build your confidence with complex numbers.

⇒ P(z) = (z – 2 + i)(z – 2 – i)(z + 1 – 2i)(z + 1 + 2i)

⇒ P(z) = (z² - 2z – zi – 2z + 4 + 2i + zi - 2i - i²)(z² + z + 2zi + z + 1 + 2i – 2zi – 2i - 4i²)

⇒ P(z) = (z² - 4z + 5)(z² + 2z + 5) [Remember: i² = - 1 by definition]

⇒ P(z) = z⁴ + 2z³ + 5z² - 4z³ - 8z² - 20z + 5z² + 10z + 25

⇒ P(z) = z⁴ - 2z³ + 2z² - 10z + 25

Thus a = -2, b = 2, c = -10, d = 25 and we’re done.