Currently unavailable: for regular students
Degree: Ancient History (Bachelors) - Manchester University
Hello there, I'm Jason Leader. I study Ancient History at The University of Manchester, and I am currently in my second year. I attained 4 A's at A Level, including History and English Language.
Teaching has always been a passion of mine, and I have been involved in many different types of tutoring. I have taught in schools for experiance, holding classes in English Language at GCSE level. I even coached my school basketball team in my own time.
History has always been of great interest for me. This is what motivated me to take History further in my education. I specialise in Ancient History, particularly Greek and Roman history, but I am open to learning new things. That is one of the best things about History as a subject, there is always something new to learn, as history is written every day.
I would love the oppurtunity to help others in my subject, and hopefully allow them to enjoy History as much as I do. History does not have to be a boring subject if taught right, and I aim to make History as exciting as I possibly can.
History is a difficult subject, and it will take time to process so much information. Having patient, friendly, one to one sessions with me can help you process this information a lot faster. I will cater my teaching to you, so you learn at your pace, and the way that is best for you.
If you have any questions, send me a 'WebMail' to find out any more information. Alternately, you can book a 'Meet the Tutor Session' to meet, both of these are available on this site. Make sure to tell me what exam board, what topic, and what aspect you are struggling with so I can cater my lessons to you.
I look forward to hearing from you!
|English Language||A Level||£20 /hr|
|Extended Project Qualification||A Level||£20 /hr|
|History||A Level||£20 /hr|
|English Language||GCSE||£18 /hr|
|Media Studies||GCSE||£18 /hr|
Nadia (Student) May 6 2016
Natalia (Parent) October 20 2015
Natalia (Parent) October 19 2015
Sonya (Parent) May 26 2015
In history you have no doubt come across, and had to use primary sources. Primary sources offer a wealth of information, but they do have their limitations. There are a number of reasons why you cannot take the words of a primary source on face value:
1. Reason: Why is the historian writing what they are writing? What style of writing is it? Fiction, non-fiction? Prose, poetry?
2. Social: Where in society did the writer belong? Was he a low lying peasant or was he a rich beurocrat? This can link to how he perceives the society he is writing about, be it a top-down or bottum-up view.
3. Political: A lot of history is about politics. Depending of what side of the political spectrum, be it right wing or left wing, could influence their writing, and thus what you are reading. Be cautious of this.
4. Economic: This links with the aforementioned point of society. Where they are in society affects how they would interpret it.
5. Geography: Where someone was born, or where they have lived, or where they where when they wrote the piece you are reading can have an influence on their interpretation of events. If you are reading a British extract of wartime conditions in World War II, you will only recieve a British perspective, thus making it useless if you wish to include an interpretation from another nations soldiers etc.
6. Bias: Every writer has an opinion and it will always show in their writing. Even if a writer claims to be neutral, it very rarely is.
Source analysis is a big part of history, and becomes a much greater deal if you choose to take your history education further.
Semantics can be seen as the face value of a text, as in what the text, if taken literally, would mean.
Pragmatics however, can be seen as the "hidden meaning" to what a text is saying. Sarcasm is seen as a form of pragmatics.
Lexis can also be a contributing factor as to how something can be interpreted and whether the semantic of pragmatic meaning of a text should be the dominant reading.
P.E.E is a simple way of answering essay questions. P.E.E stands for "Point, Evidence, Explaination". This very easy formula allows you to structure your answer, and therefore making it easier for the examiner to read, and allowing you to access the high marks.
Firstly, you state a point. This can be as abstract or as simple as you want it to be, but it must be proved. Consider this the foundation of your answer, and with any good foundation, it must be strong.
Next comes evidence. This is where you can show off your analytical skills and use the text to prove your point. Find a part of the text that you can apply to your point, and prove it.
Finally, explaination. This wraps up your point and the text itself, and makes it clear and understanding to the examiner marking your paper, that you can prove the point you have made.