'Religious language is meaningless'. Evaluate and discuss this statement.
Answer should demonstrate a coherent structure. Student should evaluate claims that disagree with their standpoint. Can include 'Logical positivists', verfication/falsification principle, A.J. Ayer. Should discuss ideas about God, faith, religion etc. Outline what meaningful language is, link this to whether relgious language holds meaning or not. May be an individual view but must be supported with examples, theorists, arguments, counter examples etc.
WA
Related Philosophy IB answers
All answers ▸Will Nietzsche be for or against the ISIS?
Evaluate the claim that the aim of all ethical principles is to cultivate sympathy
Can a utilitarian be committed to promoting more than one objective?
How is the relationship of mind and body pictured in Descartes? Is such position tenable?