'Religious language is meaningless'. Evaluate and discuss this statement.

Answer should demonstrate a coherent structure. Student should evaluate claims that disagree with their standpoint. Can include 'Logical positivists', verfication/falsification principle, A.J. Ayer. Should discuss ideas about God, faith, religion etc. Outline what meaningful language is, link this to whether relgious language holds meaning or not. May be an individual view but must be supported with examples, theorists, arguments, counter examples etc. 

WA

Related Philosophy IB answers

All answers ▸

What is more important, quoting philosophers or having my own opinions


What is Rawls' Difference Principle? Why do people say it is not egalitarian?


Describe René Descartes' wax experiment in the Second Meditation and what it shows about human experience:


What is the difference between internalism and externalism?