'Religious language is meaningless'. Evaluate and discuss this statement.

Answer should demonstrate a coherent structure. Student should evaluate claims that disagree with their standpoint. Can include 'Logical positivists', verfication/falsification principle, A.J. Ayer. Should discuss ideas about God, faith, religion etc. Outline what meaningful language is, link this to whether relgious language holds meaning or not. May be an individual view but must be supported with examples, theorists, arguments, counter examples etc. 

WA
Answered by Wonu A. Philosophy tutor

6170 Views

See similar Philosophy IB tutors

Related Philosophy IB answers

All answers ▸

What is Utilitarianism (according to Bentham)?


Explain the analogy of the divided line as an exemplary case of Plato’s epistemology


What is the difference between Bentham and Mill's Utilitarianism?


What is Rawls' Difference Principle? Why do people say it is not egalitarian?


We're here to help

contact us iconContact ustelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

MyTutor is part of the IXL family of brands:

© 2025 by IXL Learning