What is the systems response to Searle’s Chinese Room argument?

The system response to Searle’s Chinese room maintains a functionalist position (mainly outlined by Jack Copeland) and argues that Searle fails to comprehend the actual and total function of the semantic machine, and focuses on the individual in the room rather than its entirety, which constitutes the machine. Copeland argues that it is not the individual in the room that must understand Chinese as a precondition for strong artificial intelligence in the form of a machine, but rather the entire room than with all its entities and functions understands Chinese, and not the actual individual. The room as whole ought to be seen as complete system, and individual, the manual, the walls of the room, etc., are functional components that collectively constitute a semantic machine that understands Chinese

Some good references to the system response argument are John Heil’s Philosophy of Mind and the (online) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on the Chinese Room Argument.

LW
Answered by Line W. Philosophy tutor

6500 Views

See similar Philosophy IB tutors

Related Philosophy IB answers

All answers ▸

What problems can one find with a utilitarian view of ethics?


What are Gettier problems?


What is the free will problem?


To what extent is impartiality a necessary condition of moral judgements?


We're here to help

contact us iconContact usWhatsapp logoMessage us on Whatsapptelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

© MyTutorWeb Ltd 2013–2025

Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy
Cookie Preferences