Should the government intervene in cases of market failure?

The benefits of government intervention are largely dependent on the type of government intervention and the form of market failure it hopes to correct, however it is normally beneficial for the government to intervene when market failure arises. There are many forms of government intervention in a market for example, introducing taxes or subsidies, creating price flaws and price ceilings and banning the sale of the product. When the market fails it usually results in negative impacts for society whether this be negative externalities or lack of consumption, and therefore should arguably be corrected. Due to the nature of markets it is likely that it will be corrected by anything but the government and therefore in most cases the government should intervene when markets fail.

GF
Answered by Gabrielle F. Economics tutor

6843 Views

See similar Economics IB tutors

Related Economics IB answers

All answers ▸

What are the different assumptions of a perfectly competitive market and a market with monopolistic competition?


Explain why scarcity results in economic decisions being made.


Assuming an increase in the market demand for petrol, analyse the role of the price mechanism in reallocating resources.


Explain how a reduction in income tax could affect both aggregate demand and aggregate supply in an economy


We're here to help

contact us iconContact usWhatsapp logoMessage us on Whatsapptelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

© MyTutorWeb Ltd 2013–2025

Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy
Cookie Preferences