How do I decide whether the defense of intoxication can be used for any particular offence?

The first thing that must be established when deciding whether the defence of intoxication is available to an offence is whether the offence is one of basic intent or one of specific intent. Basic intent crimes are ones that do not require direct intent but where recklessness can surfice as the appropriate mens rea, where as specific intent offences require direct intention. Generally where a crime is one of basic intent there is no defence of intoxication. Where an offence is one of specific intent the defence of intoxication may be avaiable. However there are exceptions to this rule. The second thing to be considered is whether the intoxication was voluntary or non-voluntary. This helps finalise whether or not the defence is avaiable. There is much case law to illustrate these rules such as that of Kingston, Hardie and Gallagher 

TM
Answered by Tasha M. Law tutor

2111 Views

See similar Law A Level tutors

Related Law A Level answers

All answers ▸

Give the definition of "obiter dicta" made in a judgment within a case


Consider what criticism may be made of the non-fatal offences against the person.


What is the doctrine of Novus Actus Interveniens, and why is it so important?


Is there a difference between English and Scottish Law?


We're here to help

contact us iconContact ustelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

MyTutor is part of the IXL family of brands:

© 2025 by IXL Learning