What are the arguments against the existence of Free Will?

Two schools of thought dispute the existence of Free Will: the soft determinists and the hard determinists. Soft Determinists believe in partial Free Will. Kant says that we can't control the emotions we feel, but that we can control whether we act on those emotions. Basing decisions on Reason means that we act independently of prior events.

Hard determinists believe that Free Will does not exist. They assert that our actions are a result of prior, external events beyond our control. For example, a TV advert may determine me to buy a new washing machine. They believe that our sense of responsibility over the actions we commit is an illusion. 

JP
Answered by Jay P. Philosophy tutor

1481 Views

See similar Philosophy IB tutors

Related Philosophy IB answers

All answers ▸

What is the difference between internalism and externalism?


Will Nietzsche be for or against the ISIS?


How should I structure an essay?


What are the strengths and weaknesses of Kantian ethics?


We're here to help

contact us iconContact usWhatsapp logoMessage us on Whatsapptelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

© MyTutorWeb Ltd 2013–2025

Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy
Cookie Preferences