What are the arguments against the existence of Free Will?

Two schools of thought dispute the existence of Free Will: the soft determinists and the hard determinists. Soft Determinists believe in partial Free Will. Kant says that we can't control the emotions we feel, but that we can control whether we act on those emotions. Basing decisions on Reason means that we act independently of prior events.

Hard determinists believe that Free Will does not exist. They assert that our actions are a result of prior, external events beyond our control. For example, a TV advert may determine me to buy a new washing machine. They believe that our sense of responsibility over the actions we commit is an illusion. 

JP
Answered by Jay P. Philosophy tutor

1690 Views

See similar Philosophy IB tutors

Related Philosophy IB answers

All answers ▸

Evaluate the claims about experience in arguments for the existence of God, or the gods.


Can there ever be universal moral truths? If not, what is the source of moral values?


How is the relationship of mind and body pictured in Descartes? Is such position tenable?


What is the significance of using 'if and only if' in Philosophy instead of simply 'if'?


We're here to help

contact us iconContact ustelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

MyTutor is part of the IXL family of brands:

© 2025 by IXL Learning