What is the difference between a historian and a biographer?

Suetonius represents an example of an ancient biographer. While Suetonius was a Roman, the biographical tradition came from the Greeks and another example can also be found in Plutarch. Ancient biographies are not chronological (not written in time order), and focus more on the character of the individual than on major historical events. Suetonius in particular separates the good and bad aspects of his subject's character, and has a preoccupation with last words and physical appearance, believing that this can tell you more about a person than major events. Tacitus, writing around the same time as Suetonius, is an example of an ancient historian. In his Annals, he expresses the idea that history should be about major historical events, and stresses the importance of recording great battles. Historians, including Tacitus, write in a chronological order, unlike biographers, and Tacitus writes 'annalistically' - giving an account of each year in order.

MS
Answered by Megan S. Classical Civilisation tutor

4805 Views

See similar Classical Civilisation A Level tutors

Related Classical Civilisation A Level answers

All answers ▸

Do what extent can Aeneas be considered an 'epic' hero?


To what extent and in what ways were the achievements of Alexander built on those of his father Philip?


• ‘Plutarch’s biography of Alexander shows a greater understanding of the wider issues than Arrian’s more detailed history’. How far do you agree? Refer to both Arrian and Plutarch.


‘What do the buildings in the Roman forum tell us about how the forum was used during the Republic?’


We're here to help

contact us iconContact ustelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

MyTutor is part of the IXL family of brands:

© 2026 by IXL Learning