What is the difference between a historian and a biographer?

Suetonius represents an example of an ancient biographer. While Suetonius was a Roman, the biographical tradition came from the Greeks and another example can also be found in Plutarch. Ancient biographies are not chronological (not written in time order), and focus more on the character of the individual than on major historical events. Suetonius in particular separates the good and bad aspects of his subject's character, and has a preoccupation with last words and physical appearance, believing that this can tell you more about a person than major events. Tacitus, writing around the same time as Suetonius, is an example of an ancient historian. In his Annals, he expresses the idea that history should be about major historical events, and stresses the importance of recording great battles. Historians, including Tacitus, write in a chronological order, unlike biographers, and Tacitus writes 'annalistically' - giving an account of each year in order.

MS
Answered by Megan S. Classical Civilisation tutor

3967 Views

See similar Classical Civilisation A Level tutors

Related Classical Civilisation A Level answers

All answers ▸

• ‘Plutarch’s biography of Alexander shows a greater understanding of the wider issues than Arrian’s more detailed history’. How far do you agree? Refer to both Arrian and Plutarch.


How did the role of the tribunate change across the Late Republic?


How well did Cicero negotiate the dynamics of power during the Fall of the Roman Republic?


'Rich in narrative'. To which red figure vases you have studied does this best apply?


We're here to help

contact us iconContact ustelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

© MyTutorWeb Ltd 2013–2025

Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy
Cookie Preferences