Make the best case you can for public funding of the arts.

I will begin by addressing a common worry about public funding of the arts. Many people regard it as a high-brow luxury that does not require government spending. Their argument supports that government should dedicate resources to matters such as public health. However, this is a narrow argument that focuses only on short-term urgencies. The government need also to remain attentive to long-term goals. For example, public funding of the arts preserves the abundance of opportunity that humans can access to develop their abilities.Imagine if Broadway became a dying art. This would create a failure in the market as many would loose their jobs and the public would be stumped from spectating and admiring their work. Although not as urgent as public healthcare, the arts are still a valid sector in need of funding. The government should be planning for the future as well as the present. 

Answered by Uvini E. LNAT tutor

1521 Views

See similar LNAT University tutors

Related LNAT University answers

All answers ▸

How do I write a good answer to an LNAT Essay?


How can I prepare for my LNAT?


Why do I need to take the LNAT?


‘Violent games contribute to youth violence’ Discuss.


We're here to help

contact us iconContact usWhatsapp logoMessage us on Whatsapptelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

© MyTutorWeb Ltd 2013–2024

Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy