Discuss what is meant by factual and legal causation

All non-fatal offences require causation to be proved. There are 2 tests that the defendant has to pass to prove that they can be blamed for the actus reus of the crime. Factual Causation: the P has to prove that the D caused the criminal act (but for test) - case of Pagett (1983) Legal Causation: the P has to prove it is fair to blame the D for the criminal act caused by his conduct, is the D more than a minimal cause/ the legal cause - case of Cato (1976)

LJ
Answered by Lucy J. Law tutor

3145 Views

See similar Law A Level tutors

Related Law A Level answers

All answers ▸

What is meant by mens rea and actus reus in criminal law?


What is the difference between recklessness and intention?


The offence of murder is out-dated and is urgently in need of reform. To what extent do you agree?


What are the policy reasons for imposing strict liability in vicarious liability cases?


We're here to help

contact us iconContact ustelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

© MyTutorWeb Ltd 2013–2025

Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy
Cookie Preferences