Discuss what is meant by factual and legal causation

All non-fatal offences require causation to be proved. There are 2 tests that the defendant has to pass to prove that they can be blamed for the actus reus of the crime. Factual Causation: the P has to prove that the D caused the criminal act (but for test) - case of Pagett (1983) Legal Causation: the P has to prove it is fair to blame the D for the criminal act caused by his conduct, is the D more than a minimal cause/ the legal cause - case of Cato (1976)

LJ
Answered by Lucy J. Law tutor

3653 Views

See similar Law A Level tutors

Related Law A Level answers

All answers ▸

Jim doesn't like his teenage brother Ted, so decides to push him down the stairs to give him a few bruises. Ted sees Jim before the push. Ted hits the floor hard at the bottom and dies. Discuss Jim's liability for any homicide offences.


Give two reasons why the ratio decidendi of a case is sometimes difficult to determine. Use case law to illustrate your reasons. (4 Marks)


How should case law be used to answer problem questions?


How is the offence of robbery defined?


We're here to help

contact us iconContact ustelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

MyTutor is part of the IXL family of brands:

© 2026 by IXL Learning