Discuss what is meant by factual and legal causation

All non-fatal offences require causation to be proved. There are 2 tests that the defendant has to pass to prove that they can be blamed for the actus reus of the crime. Factual Causation: the P has to prove that the D caused the criminal act (but for test) - case of Pagett (1983) Legal Causation: the P has to prove it is fair to blame the D for the criminal act caused by his conduct, is the D more than a minimal cause/ the legal cause - case of Cato (1976)

LJ
Answered by Lucy J. Law tutor

3893 Views

See similar Law A Level tutors

Related Law A Level answers

All answers ▸

How dangerous are the ways in which judges can avoid following a binding precedent when making a decision?


Who is a refugee?


What is the difference between the actus reus and the mens rea?


How satisfactory is the current law on contractual terms? Consider what reforms might improve the law. You may relate your answer to terms in general, or to terms excluding or limiting liability, or to a combination of both.


We're here to help

contact us iconContact ustelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

MyTutor is part of the IXL family of brands:

© 2026 by IXL Learning