Explain G.E. Moore's argument against scepticism.

G.E. Moore performs something known as the G.E. Moore shift. This is where he takes the sceptic's Modus Ponens argument: (1) If you can doubt the natural world then you cannot know anything about the natural world (P=>Q) (2) You can doubt the natural world (e.g. because of Descartes' Deamon) (P) (c) You cannot know anything about the natural world (Q) And turns it into a Modes Tollens argument (1) If you can doubt the natural world then you cannot know anything about the natural world (P=>Q) (2) You can know things about the natural world (that Moore has two hands) (~Q) (c) You can't doubt the natural world (~P)

GP

Related Philosophy A Level answers

All answers ▸

What is the difference between moral realism and moral cognitivism?


Why is the "No False Lemmas" approach an inadequate repair to the JTB account of knowledge?


What sets Aristotelian virtue ethics apart from Kantian or utilitarian ethics?


Explain the different between act and rule utilitarianism and offer one issue with these approaches.