MYTUTOR SUBJECT ANSWERS

500 views

Why is the "No False Lemmas" approach an inadequate repair to the JTB account of knowledge?

It has been shown that replacing the justification condition in the classical account of knowledge is neither necessary, nor sufficient, to grant a person knowledge. 

Consider a person driving through 'Barn Facade country', when he happens to see the only real barn in the vicinity and forms the true belief that there is a barn in the field. Clearly this passes the 'No False Lemma' approach, but this "knowledge" was obtained in an entirely lucky fashion, so one would be relcutant to truly grant this person knowledge; thus the approach is not sufficient to guarentee knowledge.

Similarly, imagine a person who sees a large crowd from a distance and is told by an onlooker "there a 80 people in that crowd", and consequently the person forms the true belief that there are more than 5 people in the crowd. However, it turns out there is only 79 people in the crowd - the onlooker was mistaken. Here, we would certainly want to grant the person knowledge but 'No False Lemmas' denies this. Hence it is also not necessary for knowledge.

Alex W. GCSE Maths tutor, A Level Maths tutor, Uni Admissions Test Ma...

1 year ago

Answered by Alex, an A Level Philosophy tutor with MyTutor

Still stuck? Get one-to-one help from a personally interviewed subject specialist

15 SUBJECT SPECIALISTS

£20 /hr

Charlie H.

Degree: Social and Public Policy, Philosophy and Sociology (Masters) - Glasgow University

Subjects offered: Philosophy, Sociology+ 2 more

Philosophy
Sociology
Religious Studies
Extended Project Qualification

“About Me: Hi, my name is Charlie and I am a MA Social and Public Policy, Sociology and Philosophy student at the University of Glasgow.  I have always had a passion for the subjects that I learn (both in my degree and at high school),...”

MyTutor guarantee

£20 /hr

Tadas T.

Degree: MMathPhil Mathematics and Philosophy (Bachelors) - Oxford, St Anne's College University

Subjects offered: Philosophy, Philosophy and Ethics+ 5 more

Philosophy
Philosophy and Ethics
Maths
Further Mathematics
.MAT.
-Personal Statements-
-Oxbridge Preparation-

“Currently I am a third year Maths and Philosophy student at the University of Oxford. I have been interested in both Maths and Philosophy for quite a long time now and I hope I can pass both the interest and knowledge for the subject(...”

£24 /hr

Flaminia I.

Degree: International Relations and Political Theory (Doctorate) - St. Andrews Unversity University

Subjects offered: Philosophy, Spanish+ 4 more

Philosophy
Spanish
Politics
Philosophy and Ethics
Italian
-Personal Statements-

“Hello! I am an MLitt Philosophy student at the University of St. Andrews and I fell in love with philosophy in the first year of IB. I am delighted to help with political philsophy, ethics, moral philosophy, epistemology, metaphysics, ...”

About the author

Alex W.

Currently unavailable: no new students

Degree: Mathematics and Philosophy (Masters) - Oxford, Pembroke College University

Subjects offered: Philosophy, Maths+ 4 more

Philosophy
Maths
Further Mathematics
Extended Project Qualification
English Literature
.MAT.

“Experienced tutor, a second year Maths and Philosophy student from Oxford, with a history of helping students of all abilities to raise their Maths, English and Philosophy grades.”

You may also like...

Posts by Alex

How can I integrate e^x sinx?

Why is the "No False Lemmas" approach an inadequate repair to the JTB account of knowledge?

Other A Level Philosophy questions

What is the logical problem of evil?

What is Descartes' "cogito" argument?

Explain Hume’s Argument Against Miracles

Why is the "No False Lemmas" approach an inadequate repair to the JTB account of knowledge?

View A Level Philosophy tutors

Cookies:

We use cookies to improve our service. By continuing to use this website, we'll assume that you're OK with this. Dismiss

mtw:mercury1:status:ok