Explain Hume's distinction between matters of fact and relations of ideas (5)

David Hume, an empiricist, separated knowledge into categories - "matters of fact" and "relations of ideas".

Hume argues that every affirmation which is certain, such as geometry, arithmetic and algebra, fall under "relations of ideas". For example, the fact that the square to the hypotenuse is equal to the square of two sides is a relation of ideas. These facts are a priori knowledge and therefore can be known simply through pure reasoning. According to Hume, they are not significant and do not tell us anything about the world. 

"Matters of fact", on the other hand, contain a posteriori knowledge and are therefore synthetic propositions that tell us about the world. They are not certain and are based on sensory experience and cause and effect. Matters of fact are contingent truths, such as that Donald Trump is the President of the USA - this is not always going to be true. 

AE
Answered by Amy E. Philosophy tutor

49071 Views

See similar Philosophy A Level tutors

Related Philosophy A Level answers

All answers ▸

What is a priori knowledge?


I understand that God might let human-caused evil occur because he wanted humans to have free will, but why would God let natural harms occur?


How should I structure a response? (For example, 'Explain the thought experiment of Mary and the black-and-white room')


Define the meta-ethical position of moral universalism


We're here to help

contact us iconContact ustelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

MyTutor is part of the IXL family of brands:

© 2025 by IXL Learning