Explain Hume's distinction between matters of fact and relations of ideas (5)

David Hume, an empiricist, separated knowledge into categories - "matters of fact" and "relations of ideas".

Hume argues that every affirmation which is certain, such as geometry, arithmetic and algebra, fall under "relations of ideas". For example, the fact that the square to the hypotenuse is equal to the square of two sides is a relation of ideas. These facts are a priori knowledge and therefore can be known simply through pure reasoning. According to Hume, they are not significant and do not tell us anything about the world. 

"Matters of fact", on the other hand, contain a posteriori knowledge and are therefore synthetic propositions that tell us about the world. They are not certain and are based on sensory experience and cause and effect. Matters of fact are contingent truths, such as that Donald Trump is the President of the USA - this is not always going to be true. 

AE
Answered by Amy E. Philosophy tutor

47290 Views

See similar Philosophy A Level tutors

Related Philosophy A Level answers

All answers ▸

Is there such a thing as pure, rational knowledge? Would mathematics fall into this category?


Explain the empiricist distinction between simple and complex concepts.


" What do philosophers mean when they say something is ‘metaphysically possible.’ Why don’t they just simply say ‘possible’?


Outline the Logical Problem of Evil and explain why it is a problem for the thiest.


We're here to help

contact us iconContact usWhatsapp logoMessage us on Whatsapptelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

© MyTutorWeb Ltd 2013–2025

Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy
Cookie Preferences