In Kant's ethics, what is his conception of moral worth and how does it relate to duty?

Kant repeatedly emphasises the question of moral worth. He declares that it is not mere actions (‘which one sees’) that are of significance when we contemplate what it is that contains moral worth, but rather the inner principles (‘that one does not see’) that contain moral worth. The point that Kant is making here is that moral worth does not consist in the immediacy of actions as such: one can make a donation to charity, but does that ascribe moral worth to the action? On Kant’s view, the answer is no. What is significant are the principles the person has acted upon in donating money to the charity organisation. And since duty is the only thing that contains moral worth, the agent must be motivated by duty alone.

PM

Related Philosophy A Level answers

All answers ▸

How should I be writing my essay in the exam to make sure I get the most marks? What structure are they looking for?


'The fact that I can conceive of a mind as existing separately to a body is enough to prove that the mind and body are distinct substances’ 25 marks


What is the difference between act and rule utilitarianism?


What is the difference between a valid argument and a sound argument?