How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920s?

In the 1920s the League of Nations was mostly successful. The League successfully adjudicated the Aaland Islands dispute in 1921, preventing a military altercation between Sweden and Finland. Furthermore, the League resolved the issue of Upper Silesia in 1921, deciding to split the territory between both Germany and Poland, and bringing an end to the riots. However, these successes were relatively minor in comparison to its inherent structural flaws. For example, America, a leading military power, refused to join. This was problematic as American isolationism significantly detracted from the both the League's power and its legitimacy. Additionally, neither Germany nor Russia were initially allowed to join, resulting in the significant weakness of the League when dealing with larger countries. The League of Nations may have achieved minor successes in the 1920s, but this was at the cost of its future success, due to its inability to secure the support of important nations.

JN
Answered by Joseph N. History tutor

31866 Views

See similar History GCSE tutors

Related History GCSE answers

All answers ▸

Which of the following was the more important reason why the Weimar Republic was in danger in the years 1919–1923: economic problems or political unrest?


What is historiography?


Which time period made most progress made in anatomy? Answer this question in light Renaissance and industrial revolution.


How can I improve my answer to "Explain what was important about the rebellion of the Earl of Essex for Elizabethan England?" (GCSE History question from the AQA specimen paper)


We're here to help

contact us iconContact ustelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

© MyTutorWeb Ltd 2013–2025

Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy
Cookie Preferences