How convincing is Mill's account of utilitarianism? Is it ultimately defensible? (25 marks)

This question is based off of Question 5 of the AQA Philosophy A Level Unit 02 June 2018 paper.Mark SchemeThe best answers should... argue clearly and consistently; comprehensive; clear conclusion; robust defence; weight all arguments; use of philosophical language accuratelySample Essay PlanIntroduction: What utilitarianism is and as defined by Mill. Your key argumentative points.Para 1: A more in depth explanation of utilitarianism, covering some of: idea of it being consequentialist, additive, pleasure, higher and lower pleasures, rule and act utilitarianism, act guidingArgumentative points (2-4 paras)- looking for 2 or 3 in favour, with 2 or 3 against which should be successfully rejected (or utilitarianism slightly amended in order to cope with the opposing points)In Favour:SimpleEasy to applyRealistic/objectiveThe consequences of our actions seem to matterAgainst:Too demanding (mathematically)Too demanding (morally)IntegrityInhumanAgent-neutrality objectionOne-thought-too-manyComposition of happinessConclusionShould be clear and consistent with previous arguments