How far are modern liberals willing to go in endorsing social and economic intervention?

Modern liberals had no qualms with claiming that a larger state was the solution to the new socio-economic threats to freedom and individualism. I.e. John Rawls justified an extension of the state in the name of individual liberty: more laws, more spending, more taxation and more bureaucracy. Rawls insisted that while an enlarged state would require some individuals to sacrifice more of their earnings to the state in the form of progressive taxation, those same individuals could still be persuaded that this was a good and necessary thing. Therefore the ‘enabling state’ was consistent with the liberal principle of government by consent.

SJ
Answered by Samuel J. Politics tutor

2785 Views

See similar Politics A Level tutors

Related Politics A Level answers

All answers ▸

What is the political role of the Judiciary, and is it able to remain neutral from political bias?


Has devolution undermined parliamentary sovereignty?


To what extent is the constitutional system of checks and balances an obstacle to an effective government?


Is there a serious threat to the unity of the UK?


We're here to help

contact us iconContact ustelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

© MyTutorWeb Ltd 2013–2025

Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy
Cookie Preferences