MYTUTOR SUBJECT ANSWERS

364 views

What is Descartes' "cogito" argument?

In his search for unassailable knowledge, Descartes reaches in his first Meditation a hurdle in the form of his deceiving demon thought experiment. The demon Descartes imagines is one who deceives him about the authenticity of his thoughts and beliefs. Such a demon threatens to destroy Descartes’ claim to knowledge in almost all areas. The fact that in spite of the demon, Descartes cannot doubt his perceptions as they appear to him is of little consolation. It leaves him in a position no better than being able to say he is certain he feels he has a headache, even though he cannot be sure he has a head. As such Descartes’ knowledge of the physical world, if there is such a thing, is fundamentally incomplete. Though he experiences a plethora of ethereal sense data, Descartes has no facility by which to attribute to it a source.

 If Descartes is rigidly to conform to his principle of methodical doubt, it is imperative that he is able to prove at the very least that his own existence is not an illusion, as all of his other beliefs could be. At this stage Descartes is interested not with proving he exists in the way he perceives himself to through his senses. He seeks simply to prove that he is an entity of some kind.

In his second Meditation, Descartes concludes that there can be no doubt that he exists in some form. He reasons that in order to be deceived by the demon he must necessarily exist. Descartes writes, ‘There is therefore no doubt that I exist, if he deceives me; and let him deceive me as much as he likes, he can never cause me to be nothing, so long as I think I am something’. Descartes reasons that it is incoherent to suggest that something that does not exist can be deceived. Simply put, there must be an object of any deception. Moreover, Descartes argues that ‘the mere fact that I thought at all’ guarantees the fact of his existence. Even if one were to entertain the thought that they did not exist, it is by this same action that they unavoidably reaffirm their existence. Just as one must exist to be deceived, one must exist to doubt that very existence. This argument has come to be known the ‘cogito’, earning its name from the phrase ‘cogito ergo sum’ meaning "I think therefore I am". It is used by Descartes in his Discourse on Method and the Meditations.

Ryan A. GCSE English Literature tutor, A Level English Literature tut...

8 months ago

Answered by Ryan, who has applied to tutor A Level Philosophy with MyTutor


Still stuck? Get one-to-one help from a personally interviewed subject specialist

28 SUBJECT SPECIALISTS

£20 /hr

Megan A.

Degree: Philosophy (Bachelors) - Durham University

Subjects offered:Philosophy, Philosophy and Ethics+ 2 more

Philosophy
Philosophy and Ethics
History
English Literature

“Top tutor from the renowned Russell university group, ready to help you improve your grades.”

£26 /hr

Jonathan A.

Degree: Economics (Masters) - University College London University

Subjects offered:Philosophy, Maths+ 4 more

Philosophy
Maths
Government and Politics
Economics
.TSA. Oxford.
-Oxbridge Preparation-

“Currently MSc Economics student at UCL. Graduate of PPE from Oxford University. I particular enjoy teaching Economics and Philosophy A Level.”

£20 /hr

Francesca D.

Degree: Philosophy (Bachelors) - Exeter University

Subjects offered:Philosophy, Philosophy and Ethics+ 2 more

Philosophy
Philosophy and Ethics
Business Studies
-Personal Statements-

“A friendly, approachable and committed tutor with a great enthusiasm for helping students reach their full potential! ”

About the author

£20 /hr

Ryan A.

Degree: Mphil (Research) - University College London University

Subjects offered:Philosophy, Philosophy and Ethics+ 4 more

Philosophy
Philosophy and Ethics
History
Government and Politics
English Literature
.LNAT.

“Top tutor from the renowned Russell university group, ready to help you improve your grades.”

MyTutor guarantee

You may also like...

Other A Level Philosophy questions

What are qualia?

Apply the assertions of a Substance Dualist on the question of the existence of a soul.

I do not wish to tutor this subject

What is the divisibility argument for substance dualism?

View A Level Philosophy tutors

We use cookies to improve your site experience. By continuing to use this website, we'll assume that you're OK with this. Dismiss

mtw:mercury1:status:ok