Briefly explain the intentionalist-functionalist debate concerning the Holocaust.

The internationalist theory of the holocaust states that Hitler had already planned the systematic annihilation of the Jewish population, even back during his imprisonment after the Munich Hall Putch in the 1920’s. His statements in Mein Kampf and his rhetoric in his speeches was filled with anti-semitism and statements which directed towards the “master plan”. This view is supported by a vast amount of historians, including Ian Kershaw and Lucy Dawidowicz. The functionalist approach, on the other hand, claims that the holocaust was a product of the Second World War, suggesting that there was no master plan. The aim was merely to transfer the Jewish population out of the country, thus establishing the master race. Once this was not feasible, genocide was viewed as the only alternative. This view is supported by Christopher Browning and Saul Friedlander.

IK
Answered by Irene K. History tutor

10305 Views

See similar History A Level tutors

Related History A Level answers

All answers ▸

‘The military capability of the Normans was the most important reason for their victory at the Battle of Hastings in 1066.’ How far do you agree?


How to structure exam question: ‘Trotsky was just as significant as Lenin to the success of the Bolsheviks in the period 1903-1924.’ Assess the validity of this view.


“Between 1547 and 1558 England was torn apart by religious revolution” Discuss


How should I approach primary sources in my A-level exam?


We're here to help

contact us iconContact usWhatsapp logoMessage us on Whatsapptelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

© MyTutorWeb Ltd 2013–2025

Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy
Cookie Preferences