Are Supreme Court Justices merely politicians in robes?

The idea that Supreme Court justices are politicians in robes is most surely backed-up by the politicisation of the appointment process. Merrick Garland, a liberal judge, was rejected by a republican senate without even reaching the 'interview' phase of the process. This is because the man he was due to replace, Anthony Scalia, was a hardline conservative. Merrick Garland's appointment would have shifted the composition of the court to the left and as such the court would have had a more liberal interpretation of the constitution. This could be a potential stumbling block for republicans hoping to pass/abolish controversial policies- this shows that due to the huge potential effect supreme judges can have on the law, they can be seen as politicians in robes.

IR
Answered by Ilyas R. Politics tutor

4634 Views

See similar Politics A Level tutors

Related Politics A Level answers

All answers ▸

The United Kingdom uses First Past The Post ('FPTP') voting. Highlight some advantages and disadvantages of this system.


Why are ethnic and racial minorities better represented in the House than in the Senate?


Evaluate the extent to which the impact of globalisation on the state system has been exaggerated.


Consider the significance of social conservatives in US politics (10)


We're here to help

contact us iconContact ustelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

MyTutor is part of the IXL family of brands:

© 2025 by IXL Learning