Are Supreme Court Justices merely politicians in robes?

The idea that Supreme Court justices are politicians in robes is most surely backed-up by the politicisation of the appointment process. Merrick Garland, a liberal judge, was rejected by a republican senate without even reaching the 'interview' phase of the process. This is because the man he was due to replace, Anthony Scalia, was a hardline conservative. Merrick Garland's appointment would have shifted the composition of the court to the left and as such the court would have had a more liberal interpretation of the constitution. This could be a potential stumbling block for republicans hoping to pass/abolish controversial policies- this shows that due to the huge potential effect supreme judges can have on the law, they can be seen as politicians in robes.

IR
Answered by Ilyas R. Politics tutor

4697 Views

See similar Politics A Level tutors

Related Politics A Level answers

All answers ▸

What is the difference between direct and representative democracy?


What is Federalism?


What is representative democracy, and can you give examples of it?


Explain and evaluate the first-past-the-post electoral system.


We're here to help

contact us iconContact ustelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

MyTutor is part of the IXL family of brands:

© 2025 by IXL Learning