Are Supreme Court Justices merely politicians in robes?

The idea that Supreme Court justices are politicians in robes is most surely backed-up by the politicisation of the appointment process. Merrick Garland, a liberal judge, was rejected by a republican senate without even reaching the 'interview' phase of the process. This is because the man he was due to replace, Anthony Scalia, was a hardline conservative. Merrick Garland's appointment would have shifted the composition of the court to the left and as such the court would have had a more liberal interpretation of the constitution. This could be a potential stumbling block for republicans hoping to pass/abolish controversial policies- this shows that due to the huge potential effect supreme judges can have on the law, they can be seen as politicians in robes.

IR
Answered by Ilyas R. Politics tutor

4302 Views

See similar Politics A Level tutors

Related Politics A Level answers

All answers ▸

What is First Past the Post and why has it been criticised?


What is the difference between a codified and uncodified constitution?


What is the difference between direct and representative democracy?


Is the EU in Crisis (as a Normative Global Actor)?


We're here to help

contact us iconContact usWhatsapp logoMessage us on Whatsapptelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

© MyTutorWeb Ltd 2013–2025

Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy
Cookie Preferences