How should I approach primary sources in my A-level exam?

The basic expectation of any examiner when marking a source-based question is whether you have identified the value of the source to an historian with reference to the relevant historical context. This does not mean simply repeating what is written or depicted in the source. Rather, your answer should be structured around the main arguments of the source's author/producer, exploring the tone and accuracy of its content and then evaluating its potential use or limitations in the study of the historical period in question. N.B. Just because a source is not true to what we believe to be the historical accuracy of events, it does not mean the source's value is intrinsically less, as it is worth exploring why the writer has made the mistake. For example, might they be omitting information or altering the coverage of a certain event in order to fulfil a political agenda? At the same time however, you must never generalise the argument of a source based on the type of person who wrote it (e.g. if they are of a particular social class), as this may lead you to make false assumptions about the writer's arguments and you risk ignoring significant details in the source itself.

AG
Answered by Alexander G. History tutor

1917 Views

See similar History A Level tutors

Related History A Level answers

All answers ▸

How do I get better at managing my time in the exam?


To what extent was the rise of militant African American protests responsible for limiting the effectiveness of the civil rights movement in the 1960's


Why was the Maastricht treaty so hard to pass?


'The rebellions which occurred during the reigns of Edward VI and Mary I were mainly political in origin.' Assess the validity of this view.


We're here to help

contact us iconContact ustelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

© MyTutorWeb Ltd 2013–2025

Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy
Cookie Preferences