When approaching my coursework, how should I go about comparing the historians I have chosen?

This is known as historiography. It is an important part of a high-level piece of History A-Level coursework. In brief, the aim is to explain the arguments of historians through the theory of history they employ and understand its limitations. For instance, the historian Christopher Hill is well known for using a Marxist approach to history, whereby trends in production and the economy define wider social changes. In comparing your historians, it is important to try and identify the limitations of their methodology: What or who was left out? In this way, you can form a conclusion which aims to find to common ground between the historians, and in doing add validity to your answers. In terms of structure, out of the 4000 words, dedicate around 800 words towards historiography, or around one detailed paragraph per historian.

JH
Answered by Jody H. History tutor

3500 Views

See similar History A Level tutors

Related History A Level answers

All answers ▸

How far does the power of the state explain the decline of Chartism by 1850?


Describe the most important elements of the National Socialist (Nazi) ideology using examples!


To what extent did nationalism pose as a challenge to British imperial rule in colonial India in the years 1885-1947?


To what extent can the reign of Mary I be seen as a "sterile interlude?"


We're here to help

contact us iconContact ustelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

© MyTutorWeb Ltd 2013–2025

Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy
Cookie Preferences