When approaching my coursework, how should I go about comparing the historians I have chosen?

This is known as historiography. It is an important part of a high-level piece of History A-Level coursework. In brief, the aim is to explain the arguments of historians through the theory of history they employ and understand its limitations. For instance, the historian Christopher Hill is well known for using a Marxist approach to history, whereby trends in production and the economy define wider social changes. In comparing your historians, it is important to try and identify the limitations of their methodology: What or who was left out? In this way, you can form a conclusion which aims to find to common ground between the historians, and in doing add validity to your answers. In terms of structure, out of the 4000 words, dedicate around 800 words towards historiography, or around one detailed paragraph per historian.

Answered by Jody H. History tutor

2319 Views

See similar History A Level tutors

Related History A Level answers

All answers ▸

How to structure introduction for essay questions


To what extent do you agree Soviet Foreign Policy from 1900-1991 was mainly driven by security concerns?


Practice exam question AS History, how would we structure an answer: How far do you agree that Stalin's position as General Secretary was the most significant factor in the defeat of his political opponents in the years 1924- 29?


Why did the Grand Alliance fail after WWII?


We're here to help

contact us iconContact usWhatsapp logoMessage us on Whatsapptelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

© MyTutorWeb Ltd 2013–2024

Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy