How far do you agree that the government was never seriously endangered by the Prayer Book rebellion of 1549? [Question inspired by the A-Level Topic: Rebellion and disorder under the Tudors]

Recognised by contemporaries and historians alike as a major “commotion time,” 1549 was a year characterised by conflict. England experienced uprisings in no fewer than twenty-five counties and one rising which particularly rose to prominence was the Prayer Book rebellion in the South West. When evaluating exactly how serious a problem this rebellion posed for the authorities, I would firstly advise my student to deconstruct the question by isolating its keywords and, if possible, rewrite the question in the simplest way possible. For example, in this instance I personally interpret the question as ultimately asking: Was the rebellion threatening or not? As such, I would suggest this theme be evaluated through the lens of three key categories: organisation, aims and leadership. Once these aspects are considered, the student must decide on their own judgement (whether they deem the rebellion serious or not it does not matter so long as they can suitably justify their answer.) In turn, I would then guide them on constructing an essay by building upon the basic template of ‘Point, Evidence, Analysis’ and also discuss the ways in which referencing specific historians and primary sources can boost an answer.---------With regards to how I would answer the question myself, while this issue remains an ongoing area of historical debate the rebellion’s strength must not be undermined. Thus, I would disagree that it “never seriously endangered” the government. The rebellion’s geographical scope, organised nature, and aggressive activities, including the seizing of Exeter and violent action against suppressors, proved this was far from a submissive display of discontent. The masses of Devon and Cornwall were unsatisfied with the religious changes implemented by Edward VI’s council and intended to march on London to see these changes not only undone, but have their own array of additional demands adhered to. As such, while not threatening the Crown itself, my argument would still assert that the rebellion posed a very real threat to the stability of England’s government in 1549. 

SG
Answered by Sophie G. History tutor

3349 Views

See similar History A Level tutors

Related History A Level answers

All answers ▸

Tudors: Why was Richard III able to usurp the throne in 1483?


Alliances were the main cause for the First World War. Discuss


To what extent was the Soviet Union's economy the most important factor in their victory in WW1?


‘The rebellion of 1173-4 was caused by the Henry II’s treatment of his sons.’ Assess the validity of this view.


We're here to help

contact us iconContact usWhatsapp logoMessage us on Whatsapptelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

© MyTutorWeb Ltd 2013–2025

Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy
Cookie Preferences