Homeschooled Children are socially impaired in comparison with their school-educated peers

This question is not assessing detailed knowledge of this particular area - remember that the LNAT Judges your analytical thinking and skills at building a compelling argument. You need to identify your stance on the statement first, as this provides structure for the rest of your answer. Whether you agree or disagree, and the broad reasons as to why should be put in your introduction. For example; The statement that home-schooled children are socially impaired in comparison with their school-educated peers is fundamentally flawed. It negates to address the various systems put in place to ensure that this is not the case, such as parent groups to provide a network of home-schooled children and generic after-school clubs. The view expressed seems to place undue influence on the capacity of a school environment to develop a child's necessary social interaction skills, and the broad generic tone eviscerates the presence of 'socially impaired' children within traditional school environments.Your conclusion should be similar to your introduction, summing up the points mentioned there and in the body of the essay, not bringing in new information. However, you do want to end on an interesting thought, as a last take-away from what you've written. It doesn't need to be ground-breaking, but simply summarise your argument and entice the examiner to think deeply about your argument. The intro and conclusion are very important as they are the first and last thing read, and inform on your writing skills, and essay structure. The body is merely an expansion of this ideas, giving you the chance to justify what you have already made clear.