Do I need to evaluate the context of a source?

When answering a question that involves a source and asks how far it goes in supporting one historical viewpoint, the easiest thing to do is use the 'COP' system. First look at the context, what was happening when the source was produced? How might this have affected what the source says? Then look at the origin, who produced the source? Are they biased or been influenced by anyone? Finally, look at the purpose of the source. Decide whether it was produced to maybe entertain, inform, make money or another reason. This can have an affect on the reliability of the information. Complete the answer by tying up everything you've said and make a judgment on the source.

AR
Answered by Alicia R. History tutor

6204 Views

See similar History GCSE tutors

Related History GCSE answers

All answers ▸

Were Stalin's strengths the main reason why Stalin took control of the Soviet Union in the years 1924-28?


“The Night of the Long Knives was the most dramatic and significant single event during the establishment of Hitler’s supremacy” using your own knowledge (including form the photocopy) how valid is this interpretation? Give reasons


How do I avoid falling into the second mark band when analysing a source?


How do you analyse and evaluate a primary source?


We're here to help

contact us iconContact usWhatsapp logoMessage us on Whatsapptelephone icon+44 (0) 203 773 6020
Facebook logoInstagram logoLinkedIn logo

© MyTutorWeb Ltd 2013–2025

Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy
Cookie Preferences